A defendant in a law suit involving a coating failure on a multi-story executive apartment building required an expert witness in coating failures to investigate the claim, provide an expert report, and deliver trial testimony.
Action:
Chemical Dynamics was up to the challenge and provided the required expert witness support.
Result:
The defendant won the case and the judge cited the reason for his verdict in his ruling. He stated that it was the result of the compelling evidence and strong testimony provided by Chemical Dynamics.
A leading manufacturer of coatings for forestry applications requested assistance to reduce cost and improve performance by reformulating two of their product lines to form a new wood coating.
Action:
Chemical Dynamics reformulated the product lines by replacing a portion of some pigments with lower cost substitutes that provided lower cost and improved performance.
Result:
Launching a new wood coating that reduces cost by 10% while providing equivalent opacity and improved depth of color
FlameOff, a global company with sales in excess of 50 billion dollars, sought to penetrate the coatings market with new raw materials. They did not know the full range of market applications for their technology, nor did they have a commercial synthesis process for their technology.
Action:
Chemical Dynamics refined the synthesis process to enable facile production, defined multiple applications for the technology that included corrosion inhibitive pigments including replacement of chrome containing pigments, flame retardant additives, flatteners and opacity enhancement. Next, Chemical Dynamics formulated these products in multiple formulations for markets including building products, coil coatings, and product finishing. The technology was then introduced to multiple clients including current clients of Chemical Dynamics.
Result:
Soon after the technology was introduced and tested by multiple potential customers, commercial orders quickly followed. Today, this business segment is enjoying rapid growth.
When Earth Pigments Co. approached Chemical Dynamics to assist them in developing an ambient cure powder paint for architectural applications, the challenges were daunting. The coating had to be comprised of nontoxic binders and pigments, preferably naturally occurring and provide a coating with zero organic volatiles (VOC) or volatiles that are considered to be non VOC. Within a few short weeks, Chemical Dynamics was able to formulate a powder coating that met Earth Pigment’s requirements.
Most powder coatings require oven cure to either melt and fuse the thermoplastic powder or to fuse and enable crosslinking if the powder is thermoset in nature. Powder coatings are available in a range of colors similar to liquid coatings.
Advantages of powder coatings include:
little or no organic volatiles
environmental compliance
no need for solvents for reducing or adjusting viscosity
long term storage stability
lower shipping costs as the product does not contain solvent or water
no need to store volatile solvents, therefore lower insurance costs, as powder coatings are by nature 100% solids and most liquid coatings are not
Disadvantages of powder coatings include:
greater tendency for the surface to peel
poorer adhesion and more film defects such as craters and pin holes if the surface is not adequately cleaned and treated
more sensitive to contamination, more difficult to change color when finishing products
it is much more difficult to apply a continuous thin film
Powder Paint Cost
Determining the effective cost of paint that can be made from naturally occurring elements involves several issues that must be considered. These include the volume solids of the paint, application method, and the geometry of the object to be painted. For example, a paint that sells for $20 per gallon at 20% volume solids is actually more expensive on an applied cost basis than a paint that sells for $40 per gallon at 45% volume solids.
Theoretical coverage
=
Volume Solids
Dry mils required
To illustrate the cost of paint to apply one mil (0.001 inch) per 100 square foot of the $20 paint is as follows:
If a gallon of paint weighs 10 pounds and is $20/gallon at 20% volume solids = 10# of the 20 $/Gallon X 0.20 pounds of volume solids = 2.0 pounds of solid or dry paint per gallon of liquid paint for $20. Accordingly the cost of each dry pound of paint is $10. The square foot coverage of a paint is 1604 square feet per mil at 100% volume solids. Since our paint is 20% volume solids, at one mil dry film thickness, one gallon of paint will cover 1604 square feet/mil X 0.20 % volume solids = 320.8 square feet/gallon at a cost of $20. Accordingly the cost to paint 100 square feet of surface is $20 X 100/320.8 = $6.23
To illustrate the cost of paint to apply one mil (0.001 inch) per 100 square foot of the $40 paint is as follows:
A gallon of this paint weighs 12 pounds and is $40/gallon at 45% volume solids = 12# of the 40 $/Gallon X 0.45 pounds of volume solids = 5.14 pounds of solid or dry paint per gallon of liquid paint for $40. Accordingly the cost of each dry pound of paint is $7.78. The square foot coverage of a paint is 1604 square feet per mil at 100% volume solids. Since our paint is 45% volume solids, at one mil dry film thickness, one gallon of paint will cover 1604 square feet/mil X 0.45 % volume solids = 721.8 square feet/gallon at a cost of $40. Accordingly the cost to paint 100 square feet of surface is $40 X 100/721.8 = $5.54
Accordingly, in this illustration, the $40 paint provides more value than the $20 paint as it provides lower cost coverage at equal dry film thickness. The table below illustrates paint coverage per mil for paint applied at 100% volume solids.
